More good content is available at Wikipedia:Good topics. Similarly, anyone who believes that an article no longer meets the good article criteria may propose to delist it by following the instructions for reassessment. Anyone may nominate or review an article by following the instructions. If it is accepted by the reviewer, the nominated article is added to the list of good articles below. Another editor may review the article after selecting it from a queue of good article nominations then evaluating it against the good article criteria. Any editor, preferably one who creates or contributes to an article, who believes that the article meets the good article criteria, may nominate the article for an impartial reviewer to assess. The process for designating an article as a good article is intentionally straightforward.
#ENOLA GAY SONG H15 PLUS#
A small plus sign inside a circle ( ) in the top-right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is good. Adding good and featured articles and lists together gives a total of 46,360 articles (about 1 in 141). Because articles are only included in one category, a good article that has been promoted to featured status is removed from the good articles category. In practice, this means 'women, blacks, Native Americans, Chicanos, Puerto Ricans and other Spanishspeaking Americans, Asian Americans, gay men, lesbians, workingclass people, poor people, old people, and mentally and physically disabled people' (Young 1989: 267, 261). An additional 6,093 are listed as featured articles (about 1 in 1,070) and 3,956 as featured lists (about 1 in 1,650). Good articles do not have to be as comprehensive as featured articles (FA), but they should not omit any major facets of the topic: a comparison of the criteria for good and featured articles describes further differences.Ĭurrently, out of the 6,496,041 articles on Wikipedia, 36,311 are categorized as good articles (about 1 in 179), most of which are listed below. They are well written, contain factually accurate and verifiable information, are broad in coverage, neutral in point of view, stable, and illustrated, where possible, by relevant images with suitable copyright licenses. It is a fine adaptation of the book and the preparation of the mission and the top secret nature of the job given to those young men is an important story that sheds light on why the bomb was dropped on human beings.A good article (GA) is an article that meets a core set of editorial standards, the good article criteria, passing through the good article nomination process successfully.
![enola gay song h15 enola gay song h15](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary-alt:20181001172538-28328-mediumThumb-76333fig7_2.jpg)
The actors in this mini-series do a fine job in trying to express the attitudes of WWII flyers and ground crew. It was common practice for bomber crews in all the theaters of operation in World War II to name their aircraft after sweet hearts, wives or mothers. Enola Gay was the name of Colonel Tibbets' mother. It has become urban legend that he went insane because of remorse following Hiroshima.
![enola gay song h15 enola gay song h15](https://f4.bcbits.com/img/0022628344_10.jpg)
One of the crew members had a depressive personality and suffered an un-related nervous breakdown later in life.
![enola gay song h15 enola gay song h15](http://www.aviationexplorer.com/B-29_Enola_Gay/the_enola_gay_b-29.jpg)
How the numbers were arrived at is anybody's guess. Presidential advisers estimated the cost of invading the Japanese islands in human lives (American lives) would be in the hundreds of thousands. American diplomats were un-aware of these attempts. The Japanese were using back door channels to find a way of surrendering with honor, or at least to surrender and preserve their Emperor. What was the attitude of the flight crews who dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Where does the name Enola Gay come from? Is it true that one of the crew spent years in an insane asylum after committing this unspeakable act? Was the action justified? The book this is based on answers many of these questions. Hard to believe there are only two comments on this very interesting subject.